Abstract
The present study examines the possible qualitative differences between expert and novice teachers in their think aloud protocols related to solving classroom discipline problems. Expert and novice teachers were presented vignettes, under two instructional conditions—directive and nondirective—and were asked to “think aloud” as they were solving problems. Data from the think aloud protocols indicated that, in the absence of directive instructions, expert teachers formed more elaborate heuristic and strategy statements, whereas under directive instructions their statements about mental processes were similar to novices. In terms of solutions, expert teachers were more likely to rely on environment interventions when compared to novice teachers. Although instructional conditions influenced expert teachers’ solutions, these effects were isolated to certain problems. The results clearly suggest that expert and novice teachers differ in terms of their solutions and statements about mental processes related to classroom discipline problems. Expert teachers are characterized as placing a priority on defining and representing the problem, whereas novice teachers tend to represent problems in terms of possible solutions. Expert teachers’ solutions to discipline problems appear to be independent of how they represent the problem. The results were discussed in terms of the distinction between procedural and declarative knowledge.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.