Abstract

An index of biotic integrity (IBI) that used eight fish assemblage metrics was examined for effectiveness in estimating anthropogenic impacts to 60 Florida lakes ranging in size from 2 ha to more than 12,400 ha. The lakes ranged in trophic status from oligotrophic to hypereutrophic and had aquatic macrophyte abundances (percent lake volume infested) ranging from less than 1% to 100%. Fish species were classified by trophic feeding guild and tolerance to increases in turbidity or warming and decreases in dissolved oxygen concentration. Fish assemblage metrics tested were as follows: Number of fish species, number of native fish species, number of Lepomis species, number of piscivorous species, number of generalist species, number of invertivore species, number of species intolerant of increased turbidity or warming and decreased dissolved oxygen concentration, and number of species tolerant of increased turbidity or warming and decreased dissolved oxygen concentration. The total IBI scores and the data used to calculate individual metrics were unable to accurately predict the degree of anthropogenic impact to 60 Florida lakes, as estimated by personal observations of local limnologists, lake chloride concentrations, and road densities in the watersheds. Lake surface area and lake trophic status have a dominant influence on the fish assemblage metrics tested in this study. Thus, the IBI approach may be of limited usefulness for predicting anthropogenic impact in lake data sets that have wide ranges of surface areas and trophic status classifications.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call