Abstract

We have developed a modified vicinity ray tracing (VRT) method that has improved the travel time approximations and strengthened the theoretical base of the original one. The vicinity ray tracing (Kim and Cormier, 1990) method is a high-frequency asymptotic procedure to compute the wavefield in laterally inhomogeneous velocity structures. However, in calculating travel times the original VRT method only considers the central rays on the far side of the station but misses those on the side near the source. The modified version extends the travel time approximation to the rays on both sides of the station. This is facilitated by assuming that the ray paths near the surface in the vicinity of the station are parallel to each other. The modified approach has been examined with a variety of velocity models. For the model with a low velocity layer, the synthetic seismograms demonstrate that the dependence of the amplitudes on the source-receiver distance in the shadow zone is as clear as that illustrated using a classical Gaussian Beam Method. When strong lateral heterogeneity and thus multiple caustic regions are present, the synthetic wave field is still shown to be stable. As another improvement, the calculation of wavefront parameters is furnished in kinematic ray tracing system without invoking Kim and Cormier's dynamic VRT system. This alternative procedure can save large computational time without sacrificing the accuracy in synthetic seismograms.

Highlights

  • There are primarily two major trends for s olving the wave equation

  • The Gaus sian beam method (GBM) and WKBJ/Maslov method belong to another category that usually employ high­ frequency asy mptotic approximation and can be applied in laterally inhomogeneous structure

  • Both the GBM and WKBJ/Maslov are based on asymptotic ray tracing (ART) but avoid the major defect of the ART; the ART cannot deal with caustic regions, such as shadow zone, triplication zone and critical regions

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The numerical approach includes typically finite difference, finite element, and pseudo-spectrum methods They provide a full solution to the wave equation, but the l onger calc ulation time and more required computer s pace are two major drawbacks of them. This occurs for those rays between the station and the source, or the near side rays. This is followed by synthetic wavefield computations that demonstrate the validity of this new approach

VICINITY RAY TRACING
I I I wavefront
MODIFIED TRAVEL TIME CALCULATION
CALCULATION PROCEDURE
Travel Time
Synthetic Seismogram
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.