Abstract
Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) is a popular surface runoff prediction method because it is simple in principle, convenient in application, and easy to accept. However, the method still has several limitations, such as lack of a land slope factor, discounting the storm duration, and the absence of guidance on antecedent moisture conditions. In this study, an equation was developed to improve the SCS-CN method by combining the CN value with the tabulated CN2 value and three introduced factors (slope gradient, soil moisture, and storm duration). The proposed method was tested for calibration and validation with a dataset from three runoff plots in a watershed of the Loess Plateau. The results showed the model efficiencies of the proposed method were improved to 80.58% and 80.44% during the calibration and validation period, respectively, which was better than the standard SCS-CN and the other two modified SCS-CN methods where only a single factor of soil moisture or slope gradient was considered, respectively. Using the parameters calibrated and validated by dataset of the initial three runoff plots, the proposed method was then applied to runoff estimation of the remaining three runoff plots in another watershed. The proposed method reduced the root-mean-square error between the observed and estimated runoff values from 5.53 to 2.01 mm. Furthermore, the parameters of soil moisture (b1 and b2) is the most sensitive, followed by parameters in storm duration (c) and slope equations (a1 and a2), and the least sensitive parameter is the initial abstraction ratio λ on the basis of the proposed method sensitivity analysis. Conclusions can be drawn from the above results that the proposed method incorporating the three factors in the SCS method may estimate runoff more accurately in the Loess Plateau of China.
Highlights
The ability to make surface runoff estimations has become an essential part of development strategies in water resources management, flood control, and water and soil conservation [1]
The popularity of the Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method is due to its simplicity, convenience, widespread acceptance, applicability to ungauged watersheds, and requirement of only one parameter (CN), which is determined by four readily grasped watershed characteristics (soil group, land cover, surface condition, and antecedent moisture condition (AMC)) [12,13]
Where P and Q are the depth of observed rainfall and direct runoff, respectively; Ia and λ are the initial abstraction and coefficient of initial abstraction, respectively; F is the cumulative amount of infiltration; and S is the maximum potential retention, which can be calculated by where CN is in the range of 0–100
Summary
The ability to make surface runoff estimations has become an essential part of development strategies in water resources management, flood control, and water and soil conservation [1].A multitude of hydrologic models have been developed to predict direct runoff. The method was originally developed for surface runoff prediction, but has been applied to several other areas such as the infiltration, sediment yield, and transport of pollutants [3,4] It has been extensively integrated into many hydrological and ecological models [5], including AnnAGNPS (Annualized Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Model) [6], CREAMS (Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agricultural Management Systems) [7], EPIC The SCS-CN has some limitations such as lack of a land slope factor, discounting the storm duration, and the absence of guidance on antecedent moisture conditions [14,15,16,17,18,19]. These advantages and disadvantages made the SCS-CN method a perennial topic of discussion over the last four decades [20,21,22,23,24,25]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
