Abstract
In this procedure, a least-squares loss function in terms of discrepancies between D and M is minimized. The present paper describes the original hierarchical classes algorithm proposed by De Boeck and Rosenberg (1988), which is based on an alternating greedy heuristic, and proposes a new algorithm, based on an alternating branch-and-bound procedure. An extensive simulation study is reported in which both algorithms are evaluated and compared according to goodness-of-fit to the data and goodness-of-recovery of the underlying true structure. Furthermore, three heuristics for selecting models of different ranks for a given D are presented and compared. The simulation results show that the new algorithm yields models with slightly higher goodness-of-fit and goodness-of-recovery values.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call