An evaluation of the sources and extent of error in the position of implants placed using 3D-printed stereolithographic surgical guides.

Abstract

Introduction/Background. Errors can be introduced in implant placement when using stereolithographically manufactured fully limiting surgical guides due to various factors, such as discrepancies in designing and manufacturing of surgical guides (intrinsic error), built-in variations in design of mechanical components of guide systems and implant dimensions (inherent error) or due to placement error by the operator (operator error). Aim. The aim of this study was to evaluate influence of various factors on implant position when using these guides. Materials and Methods. Prosthetically-driven implant positions were planned with pre-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data and digital scans using a computer aided designing (CAD) software. Static guided implant surgery was performed under local anaesthesia using fully limiting mucosa-supported surgical guide. Pre-operative and post-operative CBCTs were superimposed using surgical sleeve as a reference to evaluate the placement error by operator (N=12). To evaluate intrinsic error, standard tessellation language (STL) files of the virtual design of the surgical guides and the STL file obtained after scanning the 3D printed stereolithographic surgical guides were superimposed. Inherent error was calculated using a geometric model. Results. Intrinsic error was observed to be a major contributing factor in angular deviation of implant, linear deviation observed at implant shoulder as well as at implant apex. Operator error was observed to be a major contributing factor for mean vertical deviation observed at apex of implant. Conclusion. This study showed that accuracy of implant placement was largely influenced by discrepancies introduced during designing and manufacturing of stereolithographic surgical guides as compared to other sources.