Abstract

In the design of piles drilled in rock, the following questions arise: (i) at what point of the soil/weathered rock/sound rock profile should the pile socket be designed; (ii) is the contribution of residual soil to be disregarded; (iii) how much consideration should be given to the pile boring method (rotary or hammering). Furthermore, usual design methods consider only the side shear capacity of the socket, which is evaluated through empirical expressions that require the uniaxial compressive strength of the intact rock (qu or UCS). And, quite often in practice, a comprehensive test program is not available, and only boring logs are available. This paper examines data from a BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) project in Rio de Janeiro, with 8 bridges, in which some 30 dynamic tests were performed on piles partly embedded in residual soil and partly in rock - a gneiss. These tests produced profiles of mobilized side shear. For the evaluation of the mobilized side shear, a series of laboratory tests were performed on rock samples with different RQDs, taken from borings at the pile sites. A relation between qu (uniaxial compressive strength of the intact rock) and RQD could be established for gneissic rocks of Rio. Values of mobilized side shear are compared to qu derived from the RQD correlation. Finally, an expression for the prediction of mobilized pile shaft capacity is put forward.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.