Abstract
Abstract In the modeling of carbon-black filled elastomers it is important to have a good estimate of the state of the elastomer itself, since many nonlinear effects originate in the matrix material. A common notion in such estimates is the idea of a “strain amplification” factor that relates a macroscopically imposed strain state to the average strain state in the elastomer matrix material. In this paper Mullins and Tobin's interpretation of the Guth—Gold and Smallwood's amplification factor, and a more recent proposal by Govindjee and Simo will be examined. All three theories are compared to the results of a series of Monte Carlo simulations on an ideal composite with a Neo-Hookean matrix and semi-rigid inclusions. It is shown that for the idealized material, one can not interpret the Guth—Gold and Smallwood amplification factors as an estimate of the strain state of the matrix material. The theory of Govindjee and Simo, on the other hand, is shown to accurately predict the strain state of the matrix.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
