Abstract
Abstract An evaluation of 5 methods for determining 5% or less cyclopropenoid fatty acids was made in terms of accuracy, precision, and sensitivity. GLC of the methyl mercaptan derivatives of cyclopropenoid fatty acids and titration with hydrobromic acid in toluene were found to be unsuitable. GLC of the silver nitratemethanol derivatives (quantitation by an internal standard) and titration with hydrobromic acid in acetic acid were equally precise, and the former required less sample; however, both methods gave low recoveries. GLC of silver nitrate-methanol derivatives (quantitation by peak area normalization) and a hydrobromic acid-benzene back-titration method gave good recoveries. The Halphen test was found to be the best general method when calibrated with a cyclopropenoid fatty acid standard analyzed by the silver nitrate-methanol GLC method (quantitation by peak area normalization) or the hydrobromic acid-benzene back-titration method.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
