Abstract
To ensure the integrity of a ground-based augmentation system (GBAS), an ionosphere-free (Ifree) filtering algorithm with dual-frequency measurements is employed to make the GBAS free of the first-order ionospheric influence. However, the Ifree algorithm outputs the errors of two frequencies. The protection level obtained via the traditional Gaussian overbound is overconservative. This conservatism may cause false alarms and diminish availability. An overbounding framework based on a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) is proposed to handle samples drawn from Ifree-based GBAS range errors. The GMM is employed to model the single-frequency errors that concern the uncertainty estimation. A Monte Carlo simulation is performed to determine the accuracy of the estimated GMM confidence level obtained by using the general estimation approach. Then, the final GMM used to overbound the Ifree error distribution is analyzed. Based on the convolution invariance property, vertical protection levels in the position domain are explicitly derived without introducing complex numerical calculations. A performance evaluation based on a real-world road test shows that the Ifree-based vertical protection levels are tightened with a small computational cost.
Highlights
The global positioning system (GPS), BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS), Russian global navigation satellite system (GLONASS) and Galileo navigation satellite system are the four types of global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) [1,2,3]
Real-world BDS data from a ground-based augmentation system (GBAS) are implemented to test the performance of the developed overbounds
This experiment is conducted at the Dongying Airport, where the GBAS prototypes are developed by Beihang University and Tianjin 712 Communication &
Summary
The global positioning system (GPS), BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS), Russian global navigation satellite system (GLONASS) and Galileo navigation satellite system are the four types of global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) [1,2,3]. For single-frequency augmentation systems, several excellent studies on the overbound of the independent errors include the CDF overbound [14,15,18], paired overbound [19,20], position-domain monitor [21,22,23] and two-step overbound [24]. Among all these approaches, the CDF overbound is the only one that is adopted in the standard. The CDF overbound is defined as in [18]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have