Abstract

Sun observations provide a robust way for determining the geodetic or true azimuth at a location. Azimuth is generally defined as the angle in the plane measured from the meridian’s north (or south) to the location of the line of interest. It is common to use the north azimuth; also referred to as “azimuth”, especially in civilian surveying applications. The astronomic meridian is obtained through astronomic observations of the Sun or North Star (Polaris) and it is important since it provides one instance of the geodetic or true meridian. There are two methods for determining the sun azimuth; the first is known as the hour angle method and the other is called the altitude method. The hour angle method requires the determination of accurate time while altitude method requires accurate vertical angle. The hour angle method is more popular because it is more accurate, can be performed at any time of day and is applicable to the sun, Polaris and other stars. In this article, an error modeling framework for the errors result in the process of determining the sun azimuth using the hour angle method; namely random errors, is presented. A Gauss-Markov model is used to represent the errors in the true azimuth estimation process. Six sets of sun observation for azimuth data; three with telescope direct and three reverse, including horizontal circle’s readings and time were collected and used in order to estimate the true azimuth of a line in a study area in central Orlando, Florida, United States.

Highlights

  • Finding the locations of points often depends on angular measurements and directions of lines [1]

  • There are two methods for determining the sun azimuth; the first is known as the hour angle method and the other is called the altitude method

  • The astronomic meridian is obtained through astronomic observations of the Sun or North Star (Polaris) and it is one instance of the true or geodetic meridian

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Finding the locations of points often depends on angular measurements and directions of lines [1]. Uring an angle at a traverse station using a directional theodolite This procedure is based on the assumption that pointings on the sun are of approximately the same accuracy as pointings on the back-sight mark. Since a large difference usually exists between the vertical angle to the back-sight mark and the vertical angle to the sun, it is imperative that an equal number of both direct and reverse pointings be taken. This is even more important when using an objective lens filter. Because of this and other errors, it is recommended that observations not be made when the altitude of the sun is greater than approximately 45 ̊ [6]

Field Procedure and Data Collection
Field Data Manipulation and Azimuth Computation
First Pointing with Telescope Direct
Second Pointing with Telescope Direct
Third Pointing with Telescope Direct
First Pointing with Telescope Reverse
Second Pointing with Telescope Reverse
Third Pointing with Telescope Reverse
Adjustment of Measurements and Error Modeling
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.