Abstract
AbstractEnergy parameter formed by multiplying the maximum strain range and the peak stress has the problem that one value may correspond to multiple fatigue damage states. For this issue, a new energy parameter suitable for tension–compression is proposed, which includes an improved strain‐energy model and a strain‐energy ratio. The improved strain‐energy model deduced by judging the volume change of the micro‐element has positive and negative function which can use to distinguish tensile and compressive deformation. The strain‐energy ratio is established to characterize the alternate tensile and compressive deformation under asymmetric cyclic loading. Then, applying fatigue test data, a modeling approach for fatigue life estimation based on the strain‐energy ratio is proposed, and three example models are also exhibited. Finally, according to the example model, the case of a cantilever beam under asymmetric cycle loading is carried out. The results illustrate the feasibility of the improved energy parameter in characterizing tension–compression state and the applicability of the strain‐energy ratio‐based model in fatigue analysis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
