Abstract
In recent years, the outbreak of numerous environmental risk incidents aroused widespread public concern about the amplification mechanism of environmental risk in China. However, few studies have investigated the influence path of environmental risk perception on behavioral responses in Chinese context from a micro perspective. In this article, we develop a multidimensional path model from environmental risk perception to behavioral responses, which aims to investigate how the public’s environmental risk perception influence its different behavioral responses, including environmental radical behavior, environmental concern behavior and environmental protection behavior. A survey data from Chinese General Social Survey 2013 (CGSS2013), was used to test the model, including questions related to information channel (e.g., media use, interpersonal network), cognitive evaluation (e.g., environmental value, public’s evaluation of environmental governance) and environmental knowledge. The results indicate that both information channel factors and cognitive evaluation factors can significantly influence the progress that from environmental risk perception to behavioral responses, of which both media use and environmental value play the amplification role in the transform process, while interpersonal network and public’s evaluation of environmental governance would inhibit public’s risk perception transforming into environmental behavior. Besides, environmental knowledge displays a key bridge role between information channel factors and cognitive evaluation factors. This research findings also demonstrated the evolution paths of three environmental behaviors under the same level of risk perception, namely, risk transformation and diffusion, risk perception enhancement and risk attenuation respectively.
Highlights
In recent years, China has witnessed numerous large-scale street protests and petitions against the construction of major projects such as chemical plants, waste disposal facilities, airports, nuclear power plants and freeways due to the potential environmental damage that may be caused by the above-mentioned facilities [1]
The results indicate that both information channel factors and cognitive evaluation factors can significantly influence the progress that from environmental risk perception to behavioral responses, of which both media use and environmental value play the amplification role in the transform process, while interpersonal network and public’s evaluation of environmental governance would inhibit public’s risk perception transforming into environmental behavior
This study finds that complicated factors come into play simultaneously in the shift from risk perception to environmental behavior, that is, both information channel factors and cognitive evaluation factors have significantly mediating effects in the progress from risk perception to environmental behavior
Summary
China has witnessed numerous large-scale street protests and petitions against the construction of major projects such as chemical plants, waste disposal facilities, airports, nuclear power plants and freeways due to the potential environmental damage that may be caused by the above-mentioned facilities [1]. Over 3000 local citizens filled Nanping Square on May. 2013 to protest the construction of a para-xylene (PX) chemical plant in Kunming, even though experts claimed that the risk from this project is rather low. These environmental protests have aroused widespread public concern about the amplification mechanism of environmental risk in China. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2856; doi:10.3390/ijerph16162856 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.