Abstract

The abundance of metaphors in psychological research, psychological theory, and our everyday language to describe psychological phenomena has been widely cited and rarely questioned. Furthermore, empirical research on this topic is surprisingly lacking. In this article, metaphors in psychology, as well as the effects of experience and problem domain on the use of such metaphors, are empirically investigated. Subjects with formal graduate training in experimental psychology were compared to those with little or no formal training. All subjects were asked to explain the phenomena described in summaries of results from four hypothetical experiments. Two of the experiments involved topics in cognitive psychology (i.e., memory) and two involved topics in social cognition (i.e., person perception). Analyses of the explanation protocols indicated that experienced subjects used more psychological metaphors than inexperienced subjects did, although both groups used everyday metaphors to the same extent and rarely ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.