Abstract
Three central results in economic theory – Brouwer’s fixed-point theorem, Sperner’s lemma, and the Knaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz (KKM) lemma – are known to be equivalent. In almost all cases, elementary direct proofs of one of these results using any of the others are easily found in the literature. This seems not to be the case for the claim that the KKM lemma implies Sperner’s lemma. The goal of this note is to provide such a proof.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
