An economic evaluation of first-line cryoballoon ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from a German healthcare service payer perspective

Abstract

Abstract Background Three recent randomized controlled trials demonstrated that, in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), first-line pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon ablation reduces atrial arrhythmia recurrence when compared to initial antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. Purpose To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of initial rhythm control therapy from a German healthcare service payer perspective. Methods The cost-effectiveness model (CEM) structure consisted of a hybrid decision tree and Markov model, where the decision tree informed the initial health state allocation in the first cycle of the Markov model and had a one-year time horizon. The Markov model had a 40-year time horizon using a three-month cycle length. Health benefits were expressed in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% p.a. Individual patient-level data from 703 participants with untreated PAF enrolled into Cryo-FIRST (NCT01803438), STOP AF First (NCT03118518) and EARLY-AF (NCT02825979) were used to estimate efficacy, resource use and health-related quality of life parameters. Cost inputs were sourced from diagnosis-related groups and the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK). Where parameters could not be derived, inputs were sourced from available published literature or determined through clinical expert opinion. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the impact of any assumptions on model outputs. Results In those treated with cryoablation, the three-month rate of AF recurrence was reduced by 46.7% (p<0.001) on average. Similarly, the average monthly rate of receiving an ablation following initial treatment was reduced by 72.8% (p<0.001). Cryoablation was also associated with a 4.3% (p=0.025) increase in health-related quality of life at 12 months, assessed through the standard EQ-5D-3L instrument. There was no difference in the rate of AF resolution in those who failed initial treatment. CEM results are shown in Table 1. Analysis shows that cryoablation is cost-effective, incurring a cost of ∼€1,000 per patient over a lifetime compared to AADs, while offering an increase in QALYs. Cryoablation attains an average ICER of ∼€5,500, with a 94.1% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €35,000 per QALY gained. Through 5,000 iterations, the probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicates that cryoablation has ∼20% probability of being cost-saving. Individuals are expected to receive a total of ∼1.2 ablations over a lifetime, regardless of initial treatment. Although, those initially treated with cryoablation as opposed to AADs experience a 45% reduction in time spent in AF health states. Conclusion Initial rhythm control with cryoballoon ablation in PAF is a cost-effective treatment option in a German healthcare setting.Table 1:Key results (per patient)