An early economic evaluation of WireSafe™ to prevent guidewire retention in central venous catheter procedures

Abstract

Background Guidewire retention (GWR) poses a patient safety risk during Central Venous Catheter (CVC) insertions and is listed as a ‘Never Event’ by the National Health Service England (NHSE). WireSafe™ is an intervention to prevent GWR, but its cost-effectiveness is uncertain. This study is an early economic evaluation comparing WireSafe™ to standard care from a UK healthcare perspective. Methods We conducted (i) a primary analysis of GWR related NHSE Never Events data in England between 2016 and 2020; and (ii) a cost-utility analysis, including healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYS) for populations receiving CVC-insertions. We applied a cost-effectiveness threshold of £30,000 per QALY and considered three WireSafe™ costing scenarios (£18.50, £4.50, and £2.50). Results NHSE Never Events data showed 61 GWR cases, averaging 1 per month. Most incidents (92%) were identified during hospital stays, with one serious adverse outcome reported (peri-arrest). In a population of 200,000, we estimate WireSafe™ would prevent 59.92 wire retentions, 5.61 procedural adverse events, 0.3 cardiac adverse events, and 0.19 deaths, improving QALYs by 4.87. In the base case analysis WireSafe™ was not cost-effective and had an economically justifiable price of £2.44. There were high levels of uncertainty in the lowest cost-scenario (ICER 95% credible interval: Dominant; £793,398). Conclusions The health benefits of WireSafe™ are limited due to low GWR rates and high identification rates, making WireSafe™ viable only at low costs. Future research should prioritise obtaining more precise estimates of these parameter values which are key determinants of cost-effectiveness.