Abstract

Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) play an important role in socio-natural ecosystems. Assessment of CES in rural areas is crucial for development planning and decision-making. However, assessment of CES at the local scale and, in particular, rural areas remain under-researched. In order to reveal the importance of different kinds of CES and the related land uses perceived by the rural residents, a simplified tick-scoring method was developed and tested in a case study of four villages in Shandong Province, China. This method poses CES questions and seeks answers about corresponding land use types in a questionnaire form that is accessible and useful to village residents. Furthermore, the important categories of CES and related land use types were identified and ranked based on the questionnaire. The results showed that ecological culture and aesthetic services ranked in the top two of twelve CES categories, while scenic spots/mountains, forests, and lakes/rivers/reservoirs scored for multiple CES and attained higher than average CES scores. Overall, the simplified method is practical to understand the perspectives of rural residents on the important CES and related landscapes. The established approach shed lights on CES assessment and management improvement at local scale of rural areas under different socio-environmental contexts in China and elsewhere.

Highlights

  • Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) refers to the non-material benefits derived from the ecosystem, such as, for example, spiritual growth and wellbeing, development of cognition and reflection, and entertainment and aesthetic experiences (Costanza et al, 1997; Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005; TEEB, 2011)

  • Our study has revealed that the simplified tick-scoring method can be used to identify and assess CES, and its related land use types in rural areas, the important CES and important land use types can be identified based on the results which showed that ecological culture and aesthetic services ranked the top two among twelve CES categories, and scenic spots/mountains, forests, and lakes/rivers/reservoirs scored for multiple CES and attained higher than average CES scores

  • These information are very important for local managers or policy-makers to avoid local CES loss when they make plans to adjust local land use types

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) refers to the non-material benefits derived from the ecosystem, such as, for example, spiritual growth and wellbeing, development of cognition and reflection, and entertainment and aesthetic experiences (Costanza et al, 1997; MEA, 2005; TEEB, 2011). As a crucial component of ecosystem services, non-material CES play an important role within more material forms of ecosystem services. Farmland and forest ecosystems provide food, climate and hydrological regulation services, and leisure and entertainment opportunities (Dong et al, 2014, Gordon et al, 2010). CES can provide opportunities for both economic and non-economic development and growth. CES research has been conducted at a range of scales. Everard et al (2010) have estimated the CES value of coastal dunes, while

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call