Abstract

Starting from the work of Hommes et al. (2005a), we propose an alternative version of their asset pricing model with heterogeneous agents and asynchronous updating of beliefs. In particular, we assume that the predictors are selected based on their accuracy in predicting the market price of the risky asset, measured as an absolute prediction error, and not on the net profits made by fundamentalists and trend followers. From a mathematical point of view, the deterministic skeleton of the present model is a two-dimensional piecewise-smooth map. We present an analytical study of the fundamental equilibrium and the coexisting non-fundamental equilibria and propose a comparison with the results in Hommes et al. (2005a). A robustness check is also conducted by considering an accuracy measured by squared prediction errors, a fitness measure often adopted in theoretical and experimental studies because of its smoothness and for being equivalent to risk-adjusted profits. The comparisons reveal that these different fitness measures do not modify the stability of the fundamental equilibrium. However, non-fundamental equilibria, their stability and the out-of-equilibrium dynamics are affected.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.