Abstract
Smart Growth has become an evident concept in public policy debates and provides answers to the enduring problems of sprawling development and its many adverse consequences. While the concept has widely been touted to promote an urban development pattern characterized by compact and mixed-use development, walkable and bikeable neighborhoods, preserved green spaces, and the availability of mass transit, not much has been written about its contribution to sustainable development. This paper is an attempt to explore the concepts of smart growth and sustainable development and the extent to which the former contributes to the achievement of the latter. The various debates surrounding the smart growth movement have also been explored. The 2003 general plan guideline by the US State of California is used as the basis for determining the sustainable development role of smart growth policies in Portland (Oregon), Arlington (Virginia), Boulder (Colorado) and Lancaster County (Pennsylvania). The paper concludes that it would be inappropriate to equate smart growth to sustainable development as the latter is a much broader concept and cuts across myriad disciplines. Notwithstanding, the implementation of smart growth policies in the cases studied have been observed to promote compact, infill and transit-oriented development and to conserve and protect open spaces and natural areas. All these are pro-sustainable development. While this paper has observed that smart growth serves as one of the approaches for achieving sustainable development goals, it calls for a more quantitative study to be able to measure the magnitude of the contribution associated with the smart growth policies.
Highlights
Urban sprawl is a visually perceivable landscape phenomenon and represents an important topic for analysis and assessment towards the sustainable development of urban areas [1,2,3,4]
The sustainable urban development goals outlined in the 2003 General Plan Guideline of the state of California [8] have been compared with the principles of smart growth so as to establish their convergence
The researchers understand that smart growth principles are not broad enough to offer a more comprehensive comparison of how smart growth policy implementation leads to the achievement of sustainable development
Summary
Urban sprawl is a visually perceivable landscape phenomenon and represents an important topic for analysis and assessment towards the sustainable development of urban areas [1,2,3,4]. 151), sprawl is defined as “ low-density, leapfrog development characterized by unlimited outward extension. Sprawl is a significant residential or nonresidential development in a relatively pristine setting. This development is low density, it has leaped over other development to become established in an outlying area, and its very location indicates that it is unbounded”. The more heavily permeated a landscape by buildings, the more sprawled the landscape. Urban sprawl denotes the extent of the area that is built up and its dispersion in the landscape. The more area built over and the more dispersed the buildings, the higher the degree of urban sprawl. The term “urban sprawl” can be used to describe both a state (the degree of sprawl in a landscape) as well as a process (increasing sprawl in a landscape)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
