Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematic data, measuring flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and internal/external rotation angle variations during locomotion, provide essential information to diagnose, classify, and treat musculoskeletal knee pathologies. However, and so across genders, the curse of dimensionality, intra-class high variability, and inter-class proximity make this data usually difficult to interpret, particularly in tasks such as knee pathology classification. The purpose of this study is to use data complexity analysis to get some insight into this difficulty. Using 3D knee kinematic measurements recorded from osteoarthritis and asymptomatic subjects, we evaluated both single feature complexity, where each feature is taken individually, and global feature complexity, where features are considered simultaneously. These evaluations afford a characterization of data complexity independent of the used classifier and, therefore, provide information as to the level of classification performance one can expect. Comparative results, using reference databases, reveal that knee kinematic data are highly complex, and thus foretell the difficulty of knee pathology classification.
Highlights
Three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematic data, measuring knee flexion/extension, abduction/ adduction, and internal/external rotation, are increasingly used in gait analysis towards quantifying the knee function [1], understanding pathological knee alterations [2], and assessing the progression of knee pathologies and their impact on the gait [3, 5]
We recall that data complexity assessment used 40 osteoarthritis patients (OA) and 40 control participants (AS)
This study investigated 3D knee kinematic data complexity using both single feature and global feature complexity metrics
Summary
Three-dimensional (3D) knee kinematic data, measuring knee flexion/extension, abduction/ adduction, and internal/external rotation, are increasingly used in gait analysis towards quantifying the knee function [1], understanding pathological knee alterations [2], and assessing the progression of knee pathologies and their impact on the gait [3, 5]. They offer opportunities for diagnostics [6], classification [7], and therapy of knee musculoskeletal pathologies [8]. Several studies have used knee kinematic data to obtain crucial information about musculoskeletal pathologies [9], to distinguish between knee osteoarthritis and asymptomatic subjects [10], and to further
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have