Abstract

In air traffic control, the airspace is divided into several smaller sectors for better management of air traffic and air traffic controller workload. Such sectors are usually managed by a team of two air traffic controllers: planning controller (D-side) and executive controller (R-side). D-side controller is responsible for processing flight-plan information to plan and organize the flow of traffic entering the sector. R-side controller deals with ensuring safety of flights in their sector. A better understanding and predictability of D-side controller actions, for a given traffic scenario, may help in automating some of its tasks and hence reduce workload. In this paper, we propose a learning model to predict D-side controller actions. The learning problem is modeled as a supervised learning problem, where the target variables are D-side controller actions and the explanatory variables are the aircraft 4D trajectory features. The model is trained on six months of ADS-B data over an en-route sector, and its generalization performance was assessed, using crossvalidation, on the same sector. Results indicate that the model for vertical maneuver actions provides highest prediction accuracy (99%). Besides, the model for speed change and course change action provides predictability accuracy of 80% and 87%, respectively. The model to predict the set of all the actions (altitude, speed, and course change) for each flight achieves an accuracy of 70% implying for 70% of flights; D-side controller’s action can be predicted from trajectory information at sector entry position. In terms of operational validation, the proposed approach is envisioned as ATCO assisting tool, not an autonomous tool. Thus, there is always ATCO discretion element, and as more ATCO actions are collected, the models can be further trained for better accuracy. For future work, we will consider expanding the feature set by including parameters such as weather and wind. Moreover, human in the loop simulation will be performed to measure the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Highlights

  • Introduction e primary purpose of AirTraffic Control (ATC) worldwide is to prevent collisions, organize and expedite the flow of air traffic, and provide information and other support for pilots [1]

  • D-side controller employs a variety of strategies/actions, i.e., combination of altitude, speed, course change, hold maneuvers, etc. to maintain an orderly flow of the incoming traffic in a sector. us, it minimizes crossings events which may lead to loss of separation. is ensures, at a tactical level, a minimum intervention is required from the R-side controller while managing the air traffic in a given sector. e R-side controller uses the Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) tool [5] to predict any loss of separation in a 4 to 8 minutes look-ahead time window. e R-side controller is mainly concerned with tactical interventions to maintain safe separation between flights

  • We have looked into learning and predicting the D-side controller’s action for a given traffic scenario in a sector using two tree-based regression and classification method known as Random Forest and XGBoost. is learning problem was modeled as a classification problem where the target variable is D-side controller actions and the explanatory variables are the aircraft 4D trajectory features prior to entering a sector. e air traffic trajectories constructed through ADS-B data are analyzed spatial-temporal with sector data to establish that patterns in D-side controllers exist

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduction e primary purpose of AirTraffic Control (ATC) worldwide is to prevent collisions, organize and expedite the flow of air traffic, and provide information and other support for pilots [1]. E D-side controller is primarily responsible for processing flight-plan information to plan, coordinate, and organize the flow of air traffic entering into a sector. D-side controller uses the flight-plan information and employs Medium Term Conflict Detection (MTCD) tool [4] to predict aircraft trajectories in a 20 minute look-ahead time window. E primary objective of this planning is to maintain an orderly flow of traffic and to minimize crossings which may lead to a loss of separation (LOS) scenario for an R-Side controller to intervene. In some circumstances (e.g., bad weather), the aircraft may need to be handed off differently than the letter of agreement In those cases, the D-side controller must coordinate with the other sector controller to ask for approval for another route which is not specified in the letter of agreement before the aircraft cross the boundary

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call