Abstract

Nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries have the potential to aid in the electrification of our society due to their relatively high theoretical energy density. Unfortunately, the technology suffers from large degrees of irreversibility due to the aggressive chemical environment associated with the oxidation of the discharge product lithium peroxide. Herein, we present a study of a range of linear and cyclic amides and ureas as aprotic electrolyte solvents for the Li–O2 battery, some of which show slight increases in reversibility relative to the well-established pseudo-stable glymes, although we find that none provide reversibility necessary to enable a rechargeable system. Using quantitative differential electrochemical mass spectrometry, acid titrations, and isotopic labeling of O2 and carbon in the positive electrode, we provide insight into the degradation pathways for these solvents. In the companion article, we compare our experimental results presented here to solvent decomposition pathways including a Baeyer–Villiger oxidation mechanism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.