Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to describe ambidextrous learning in organizations within the customer order-based context (COBC), here based on a dynamic view of work processes. The study focuses on how organizations can learn while working with customer orders, considering learning in organizations as both a process and an outcome.Design/methodology/approachThis conceptual article focuses on learning in the COBC, where the individual customer requirements represent a key input into the organization’s work processes, thus limiting the possibilities to plan and standardize. The COBC brings about challenges and potentials for learning in organizations where task variety and complexity are high and in which the contradictory interplay between efficiency and responsiveness is apparent not only at a strategic level but also at an operative level in the customer order fulfillment processes. Depending on the variations in tasks and parallel complex work processes between different units in the organization, the ambidextrous learning dynamic can appear in the COBC.FindingsFive propositions were made from the analysis: Proposition 1: Learning in the COBC can occur both in real-time but also in retrospect and with sporadic and recurrent interventions. Proposition 2: Learning in the COBC can occur for, as well as from, customer order processes. Proposition 3: Learning in the COBC varies and will depend on the delivery strategy. Proposition 4: Learning can be stimulated by the variation in priorities among customer orders in the COBC because the work characteristics for the back office and front office differ between customer order fulfillment processes. Proposition 5: Learning in the COBC can occur both within the back office and front office but also between these organizational units. The paper discusses the importance of building learning infrastructure in COBC and how that can be supported by a suggested learning office.Originality/valueThe present study demonstrates the importance of functions being able to act both as back office and front office in relation to delivery strategy. It also shows the ambidextrous learning process for the sake of improving both the internal efficiency and external effectiveness across the organization.

Highlights

  • Based on technical rationality and positivist ideals, research in the industrial context has been criticized for being brought into “an intellectual blind spot”

  • Learning can be stimulated by the variation in priorities among customer orders in the customer order-based context (COBC) because the work characteristics for the back office and front office differ between customer order fulfillment processes

  • 4.1 Building a learning infrastructure in the customer order-based context The dualities that arise between the logics of standardization and customization and between work in the back office and front office depend on having flexible structures for learning

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Based on technical rationality and positivist ideals, research in the industrial context has been criticized for being brought into “an intellectual blind spot” © Annika Engström, Nikolas Käkelä and Joakim Wikner. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode. The Learning Organization Emerald Publishing Limited 0969-6474

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.