Abstract
AbstractCatalytic gas‐phase hydrodechlorination (HDC) of 2,4‐dichlorophenol (2,4‐DCP) has been investigated over Ni/Al2O3 and Au/Al2O3 prepared by impregnation, and Au–Ni/Al2O3 prepared by reductive deposition of Au onto Ni. Catalyst activation by temperature‐programmed reduction is examined and the activated catalysts are characterized in terms of H2 chemisorption, XRD and TEM‐energy dispersive X‐ray (EDX) measurements. Ni/Al2O3 (<1–10 nm) and Au/Al2O3 (<1–15 nm) exhibit a relatively narrow metal size distribution while Au–Ni/Al2O3 bore larger particles (1–30 nm) with variable surface Ni/Au ratios. Au/Al2O3 exhibits low H2 uptake and low HDC activity to generate 2‐chlorophenol (2‐CP) as the sole product. H2 chemisorption on Au–Ni/Al2O3 was approximately five times lower than that recorded for Ni/Al2O3 but both catalysts delivered equivalent initial HDC activities. Ni/Al2O3 exhibits an irreversible temporal deactivation where partial dechlorination to 2‐CP is increasingly favored over full dechlorination to phenol. In contrast, thermal treatment of Au–Ni/Al2O3 in H2 after reaction elevates HDC activity with a preferential full HDC to phenol. This response is linked to a surface reconstruction resulting in a more homogeneous combination of Ni and Au. This result was also achieved by a direct treatment of Au–Ni/Al2O3 with HCl. A parallel/ consecutive kinetic model is used to quantify the catalytic HDC response.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.