Abstract

Simple SummaryAnts can be major pests to homeowners and other property owners. In the U.S., ants often rank as one of the most common and difficult-to-control pests around and in homes, businesses, and other facilities. Typically, ant control practices are conducted by licensed pest management professionals with sprays, baits, and granular products, containing various types of insecticides, applied to the outside perimeter of infested structures. Many of the insecticides used to control pest ants are harmful to non-target organisms, especially those in aquatic environments. To address these negative environmental impacts, research on alternative, generally low-impact and least toxic, ant control strategies has received a fair amount of attention. The underlying goal of this research is a reduction in human exposure to traditional insecticides. Examples of alternative approaches included in this review article include the use of essential oils and other chemicals as deterrents to ant nesting and foraging; ant trail pheromones as disruptants to foraging; mass trapping of ants; new gel baits containing extremely low concentrations of insecticide; and altering the behavior and distribution of ants by altering their access to food.Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), especially the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), can be significant nuisance pests in urban and suburban environments. Conventional interventions have primarily relied on the use of chemical insecticides, namely fipronil and bifenthrin, applied as residual, contact treatments around the outside perimeter of infested structures. Despite tightening regulation limiting the scope of insecticide applications in urban settings, dependence on these products to manage ants continues, resulting in significant water contamination. The U.S. EPA, in response, has further restricted the use patterns of many insecticides used for ant control in professional and over-the-counter markets. The purpose of this review is to summarize the relevant literature associated with controlling nuisance pest ants, with emphasis on L. humile, without the use of liquid broadcast applications of EPA-registered insecticides while focusing on low-impact, alternative (to broadcast applications) pest control methods. Specific subsections include Trail Pheromone; Use of Behavior-Modifying Chemicals; Mass Trapping; Hydrogels, “Virtual” Baiting, and Exceedingly-Low Bait Concentrations; Food Source Reduction; Deterrents; and RNA Interference (RNAi).

Highlights

  • In 2013, the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in an effort “to reduce ecological exposure from residential uses of pyrethroid and pyrethrin products,” implemented an initiative to revise guidelines for pyrethroid- and pyrethrin-based pesticide products used in non-agricultural outdoor settings [8]

  • Small quantities of (Z)-9-hexadecenal were attractive to Argentine ants, and in field experiments pulled them short distances from existing trails and nests to areas treated with the pheromone, while in the laboratory Argentine ant mortality was enhanced when (Z)-9-hexadecenal was added to a common fipronil or bifenthrin spray [24]

  • Insecticide-exposed, live termites served as ant “bait.” Termites were treated with fipronil and, while still alive, placed into small laboratory ant colonies consisting of several hundred worker ants and some brood

Read more

Summary

Standard Ant Control Methods Can Be Problematic

The use of residual contact chemical insecticides to control nuisance infestations of ants raises concern about the realized and potential drawbacks to their use. In 2013, the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in an effort “to reduce ecological exposure from residential uses of pyrethroid and pyrethrin products,” implemented an initiative to revise guidelines for pyrethroid- and pyrethrin-based pesticide products used in non-agricultural outdoor settings [8] This initiative limited non-agricultural outdoor uses of pyrethroids and pyrethrins to spot or crack-and-crevice treatments only with a few exceptions. Greenberg et al [10] evaluated fipronil and bifenthrin levels in run-off and irrigation water directly following residential home treatments for Argentine ants. A temporal pattern was observed, with higher fipronil levels in the samples from April to October, while levels decreased from October through March This pattern reflects the higher activity of Argentine ants in the warmer months resulting in greater use of insecticides and coincides with more frequent rain events leading to more insecticide being washed away in the run-off water. The fipronil and fipronil derivative levels found in the water samples often exceeded the LC50 values for local, aquatic arthropods

Alternative Methods of Ant Control
Trail Pheromone
Use of Behavior-Modifying Chemicals
Mass Trapping
Food Source Reduction
Findings
Deterrents
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call