Alternate load path behaviour in structures with non-symmetrical design under column missing scenario

Abstract

In the design and assessment of reinforced concrete (RC) structure against progressive collapse via single column removal scenario, also known as “alternate load path method”, development of secondary mechanisms, i.e. compressive arch action (CAA) and catenary action (CA) in double-span beams has been investigated and identified in many previous researches. The majority of the experimental tests are conducted on symmetrical double-span beams (identical span length and reinforcement detailing at both beam span). However, variations in details of beams adjacent to one another are not uncommon in RC building designs and constructions. Hence, a research study (as presented in this paper) with total of 5 RC frame tests are conducted to investigate the development of secondary mechanisms (CAA and CA) in a double-span beam with unsymmetrical 1) span length and 2) beam detailing. For each unsymmetrical case (span length and beam detailing), there will be 1 unsymmetrical double-span beam, and 2 symmetrical double-span beams (each representing one side of the unsymmetrical double-span beam) to serve as reference for quantifying the development of secondary mechanism in unsymmetrical double-span beams. The behaviour and development of secondary mechanisms are thoroughly analysed based on test observation, measured forces and displacements, etc.