Abstract

Objective To investigate the alternate application efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and constant-frequency mechanical ventilation in the treatment of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Methods From April 2015 to August 2017, 174 premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome were chosen in this research and randomly divided into three groups.CF group was treated with constant-frequency mechanical ventilation, HF group was treated with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, AP group was treated with alternate application of constant-frequency mechanical ventilation and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation.After treatment, the oxygen time, mechanical ventilation time, oxygenation, complications and survival in the three groups were compared. Results The oxygen time, mechanical ventilation time of the AP group were shorter than those of the HF group and the CF group, the differences were statistically significant (all P 0.05). Conclusion Alternate application of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and constant-frequency mechanical ventilation in the treatment of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome can improve oxygenation, shorten oxygen time and mechanical ventilation time, with good safety. Key words: Respiratory distress syndrome; Premature infants; Constant-frequency mechanical ventilation; High-frequency oscillatory ventilation

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call