Abstract

The hypothesis that mismatch between transmembrane (TM) length and bilayer width controls TM protein affinity for ordered lipid domains (rafts) was tested using perfringolysin O (PFO), a pore-forming cholesterol-dependent cytolysin. PFO forms a multimeric barrel with many TM segments. The properties of PFO mutants with lengthened or shortened TM segments were compared with that of PFO with wild type TM sequences. Both mutant and wild type length PFO exhibited cholesterol-dependent membrane insertion. Maximal PFO-induced pore formation occurred in vesicles with wider bilayers for lengthened TM segments and in thinner bilayers for shortened TM segments. In diC(18:0) phosphatidylcholine (PC)/diC(14:1) PC/cholesterol vesicles, which form ordered domains with a relatively thick bilayer and disordered domains with a relatively thin bilayer, affinity for ordered domains was greatest with lengthened TM segments and least with shortened TM segments as judged by FRET. Similar results were observed by microscopy in giant vesicles containing sphingomyelin in place of diC(18:0) PC. In contrast, in diC(16:0) PC/diC(14:0) PC/diC(20:1) PC/cholesterol vesicles, which should form ordered domains with a relatively thin bilayer and disordered domains with a relatively thick bilayer, relative affinity for ordered domains was greatest with shortened TM segments and least with lengthened TM segments. The inability of multi-TM segment proteins (unlike single TM segment proteins) to adapt to mismatch by tilting may explain the sensitivity of raft affinity to mismatch. The difference in width sensitivity for single and multi-TM helix proteins may link raft affinity to multimeric state and thus control the assembly of multimeric TM complexes in rafts.

Highlights

  • How transmembrane (TM) proteins interact with ordered membrane domains remains unknown

  • The results indicate that the affinity of perfringolysin O (PFO) for ordered lipid domains is increased by matching between TM segment lengths and bilayer width in the ordered domains

  • Residue 215 is a sensitive probe of PFO conformation because it moves from about 62 Å above the membrane surface to a position located within the hydrophobic core in the bilayer during the conversion of PFO from the prepore state to the TM barrelcontaining pore-forming state [36]

Read more

Summary

Background

How transmembrane (TM) proteins interact with ordered membrane domains (rafts) remains unknown. The hypothesis that mismatch between transmembrane (TM) length and bilayer width controls TM protein affinity for ordered lipid domains (rafts) was tested using perfringolysin O (PFO), a pore-forming cholesterol-dependent cytolysin. Unlike a saturated lipid anchoring a peripheral membrane protein, the lipid-facing surface of TM sequences would disrupt lipid-lipid van der Waals interactions in tightly packed ordered domains without replacing them with equivalent lipid-protein interactions [12,13,14]. This should oppose facile incorporation of TM proteins into ordered domains

The abbreviations used are
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call