Abstract

The hippocampus plays important roles in memory processing. However, the hippocampus is not a homogeneous structure, which consists of several subfields. The hippocampal subfields are differently affected by many neurodegenerative diseases, especially mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment (svMCI) are the two subtypes of MCI. aMCI is characterized by episodic memory loss, and svMCI is characterized by extensive white matter hyperintensities and multiple lacunar infarctions on magnetic resonance imaging. The primary cognitive impairment in svMCI is executive function, attention, and semantic memory. Some variations or disconnections within specific large-scale brain networks have been observed in aMCI and svMCI patients. The aim of this study was to investigate abnormalities in structural covariance networks (SCNs) between hippocampal subfields and the whole cerebral cortex in aMCI and svMCI patients, and whether these abnormalities are different between the two groups. Automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields was performed with FreeSurfer 5.3, and we selected five hippocampal subfields as the seeds of SCN analysis: CA1, CA2/3, CA4/dentate gyrus (DG), subiculum, and presubiculum. SCNs were constructed based on these hippocampal subfield seeds for each group. Significant correlations between hippocampal subfields, fusiform gyrus (FFG), and entorhinal cortex (ERC) in gray matter volume were found in each group. We also compared the differences in the strength of structural covariance between any two groups. In the aMCI group, compared to the normal controls (NC) group, we observed an increased association between the left CA1/CA4/DG/subiculum and the left temporal pole. Additionally, the hippocampal subfields (bilateral CA1, left CA2/3) significantly covaried with the orbitofrontal cortex in the svMCI group compared to the NC group. In the aMCI group compared to the svMCI group, we observed decreased association between hippocampal subfields and the right FFG, while we also observed an increased association between the bilateral subiculum/presubiculum and bilateral ERC. These findings provide new evidence that there is altered whole-brain structural covariance of the hippocampal subfields in svMCI and aMCI patients and provide insights to the pathological mechanisms of different MCI subtypes.

Highlights

  • The hippocampus is part of the limbic system

  • We compared the differences in strength of structural covariance between groups

  • The score of Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) was significantly lower in the aMCI group than in the control group, but there was no significant difference in score of MMSE between the svMCI and normal controls (NC) groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The hippocampus is part of the limbic system. It plays important roles in memory processing, especially spatial memory [1]. Studies have shown that the hippocampus can be affected by a variety of neurological diseases such as epilepsy and schizophrenia [2, 3]. The hippocampus is not a homogeneous structure, which consists of several subfields, the cornu ammonis (CA) areas 1–4, the dentate gyrus (DG), the subiculum, and the presubiculum [5]. Evidence supports the distinct connectivity between hippocampal subfields and other brain regions. The efferent fibers, which may originate from CA or subiculum, terminate in many brain regions (e.g., entorhinal area, posterior cingulate, medial frontal cortex, and gyrus rectus) [7]. Previous studies reported that the hippocampal subfields were differently affected by many neurodegenerative diseases, especially mild cognitive impairment (MCI) [8, 9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.