Abstract

Among the major unresolved questions in ecosystem evolution are whether coevolving multispecies communities are dominated more by biotic or by abiotic factors, and whether evolutionary stasis affects performance as well as ecological profile; these issues remain difficult to address experimentally. Digital evolution, a computer-based instantiation of Darwinian evolution in which short self-replicating computer programs compete, mutate, and evolve, is an excellent platform for investigating such topics in a rigorous experimental manner. We evolved model communities with ecological interdependence among community members, which were subjected to two principal types of mass extinction: a pulse extinction that killed randomly, and a selective press extinction involving an alteration of the abiotic environment to which the communities had to adapt. These treatments were applied at two different strengths (Strong and Weak), along with unperturbed Control experiments. We performed several kinds of competition experiments using simplified versions of these communities to see whether long-term stability that was implied previously by ecological and phylogenetic metrics was also reflected in performance, namely, whether fitness was static over long periods of time. Results from Control and Weak treatment communities revealed almost completely transitive evolution, while Strong treatment communities showed higher incidences of temporal intransitivity, with pre-treatment ecotypes often able to displace some of their post-recovery successors. However, pre-treatment carryovers more often had lower fitness in mixed communities than in their own fully native conditions. Replacement and invasion experiments pitting single ecotypes against pre-treatment reference communities showed that many of the invading ecotypes could measurably alter the fitnesses of one or more residents, usually with depressive effects, and that the strength of these effects increased over time even in the most stable communities. However, invaders taken from Strong treatment communities often had little or no effect on resident performance. While we detected periods of time when the fitness of a particular evolving ecotype remained static, this stasis was not permanent and never affected an entire community at once. Our results lend support to the fitness-deterioration interpretation of the Red Queen hypothesis, and highlight community context dependence in determining fitness, the shaping of communities by both biotic factors and abiotic forcing, and the illusory nature of evolutionary stasis. Our results also demonstrate the potential of digital evolution studies to illuminate many aspects of evolution in interacting multispecies communities.

Highlights

  • 1.1 Who Holds Court in Biological Communities, the Queen or the Jester? The stability of biological communities made up of multiple interacting species may be considered from both strictly ecological [39, 42, 48, 50] and evolutionary [17, 27, 31, 52] perspectives; namely, whether the same factors that lead to ecological stability will produce resistance to evolutionary change, or whether these ecological interactions instead drive evolutionary change

  • We examine whether or not such stability exists at the whole-community or individual-niche level, whether there is any occurrence of temporal intransitivity, and whether mass extinctions can alter these kinds of evolutionary and population dynamics

  • Our results show the potential for digital evolution to contribute to studying dynamics of multispecies community interactions, combining them with aspects of macroevolution for a fuller understanding of how community composition and ecological and evolutionary responses are shaped over time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Who Holds Court in Biological Communities, the Queen or the Jester? The stability of biological communities made up of multiple interacting species may be considered from both strictly ecological [39, 42, 48, 50] and evolutionary [17, 27, 31, 52] perspectives; namely, whether the same factors that lead to ecological stability will produce resistance to evolutionary change, or whether these ecological interactions instead drive evolutionary change. There are two major primary contrasting views of multispecies community evolution: the Red Queen [36, 52] and the Court Jester [4]. In the former, the “environment” is defined largely by biotic interactions among community members, which are the primary drivers of evolution. A third view, dubbed “ecological locking” [41], posits a web of biotic interactions among community members, but these interactions come to impede evolution by generating communitywide stabilizing selection, rather than driving evolution through continual directional selection. Real evolution contains elements of all these views [19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 46]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call