Alteration and strength heterogeneity of the volcanic dome at La Soufrière de Guadeloupe (Eastern Caribbean)

Abstract

Hydrothermal alteration, which alters the chemical composition and physical state of volcanic rocks, can weaken a volcanic edifice, potentially leading to instability and collapse, thereby endangering the livelihoods of neighbouring residents. Instability scenarios can be modelled using large-scale numerical models, the accuracy of which depends on acquiring the physical and mechanical properties of volcanic rocks from laboratory measurements. Routinely, laboratory studies provide measurements for small sample suites (< 10) and, as a result, we do not fully grasp the range of rock properties that describe a particular unit or volume of the volcano, nor is it clear whether the few samples collected are representative. Here, we introduce a method that can help us select the most appropriate value, or range of values, for the physical and mechanical properties of volcanic rocks for large-scale numerical models.We collected nearly 550 rocks from seven different sampling sites at La Soufrière de Guadeloupe, an active andesitic stratovolcano in the Eastern Caribbean. The rocks were assigned an alteration grade index, from 1 (least altered) to 5 (most altered), based on a visual assessment of their alteration. Their bulk densities were then measured in the field using the Archimedes method and, lastly, their strengths were measured using a point load tester, a field strength measuring apparatus. Alteration grade index ranges from 1 to 5 , bulk densities range from less than 1000 to 2700 kg/m3, and point load strength values span from 0.012 to 8.53 MPa . Point load strength and alteration distribution maps for the seven sampling locations show not only that rock physical properties vary greatly at an individual location, but also that the distributions of alteration and strength vary from place to place, highlighting the large heterogeneity of the dome at La Soufrière de Guadeloupe.To calibrate these field data, we took small samples of the tested rocks back to the laboratory for porosity and uniaxial compressive strength measurements. Porosity measurements, ranging from 0.02 to 0.8, exhibited a strong correlation with field density values. The extremely altered rocks, deemed alteration grade index 5, despite having porosities ranging from 0.11 to 0.8, did not exceed point load strength of 2 MPa, suggesting that strength was not solely dependent on porosity. We also found that strength decreases as a function of increasing porosity and alteration grade index. Although uniaxial compressive strength tests revealed synchronicity with point load strength data, our current goal is to perform further tests to better constrain this relationship.The point load test is a field method that can simplify the logistic problems behind strength assessments of volcanic domes, and likewise enlarge the sampling suite of individual studies. Calibrating field results to uniaxial compressive strength laboratory data will allow our data to be used in volcano stability models and accommodate direct conversion, from point load values to uniaxial compressive strength values, on-site. The potential abundance of available data, and spatial strength distributions, could make the large-scale models more realistic, and consequently more accurate and reliable.