Abstract
In this article, the author discusses the interpretation of article 7(3) of the UN Model Tax Treaty and the allocation of head office expenses to a permanent establishment under Indonesia’s domestic law. The article reviews Indonesian case law, which has generally upheld the indirect method of allocation, despite double taxation outcomes, and supported the tax authority’s demands for detailed supplementary information and documentation beyond consolidated accounts and audited allocation methodologies. The author also addresses arm’s length pricing of intra-group services and suggests that it might be challenged by the Indonesian tax authority in the determination of taxable profit of a permanent establishment in Indonesia.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
