Abstract
Droughts, understood as natural and anthropogenic hazards, are studied as disasters, given the disruption they provoke to "normality" and livelihood. From damages to crops and livestock to unemployment and migration, droughts are framed as shocking events that carry negative effects on human life. Still, the consequences of their response policies are often underdiscussed. This article presents how post-drought investment increases agricultural productivity, by using precipitation and economic production as main factors for its allocation. Using data from 2003 to 2018 at the municipal level, panel regressions and matching methods are performed. Results indicate that those municipalities with disaster declarations and relief investment present a higher level of yield in the future compared to municipalities with similar meteorological conditions but without disaster declaration. The article shows how disaster definitions matter as policy processes, given the consequences that programs and policies have in the future of communities and in their relationship with hazards.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.