Abstract

All-ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPDs) have an esthetic approach for oral rehabilitation. However, metal-ceramic FPDs are best indicated in the posterior area where the follow-up studies found a lower failure rate. This 2D finite element study compared the stress distribution on 3-unit all-ceramic and metal-ceramic FPDs and identified the areas of major risk of failure. Three FPD models were designed: (1) metal-ceramic FPD; (2) All-ceramic FPD with the veneering porcelain on the occlusal and cervical surface of the abutment tooth; (3) All-ceramic FPD with the veneering porcelain only on the occlusal surface. A 100 N load was applied in an area of 0.5 mm2 on the working cusps, following these simulations: (1) on the abutment teeth and the pontic; (2) only on the abutment teeth; and (3) only on the pontic. Relative to the maximum stress values found for the physiological load, all-ceramic FPD with only occlusal veneering porcelain produced the lowest stress value (220 MPa), followed by all-ceramic FPD with cervical veneering porcelain (322 MPa) and metal-ceramic FPD (387 MPa). The stress distribution of the load applied on the abutments was significantly better compared to the other two load simulations. The highest principal stress values were low and limited in a small area for the three types of models under this load. When the load was applied on the pontic, the highest stress values appeared on the connector areas between the abutments and pontic. In conclusion, the best stress values and distribution were found for the all-ceramic FPD with the veneering porcelain only on the occlusal surface. However, in under clinical conditions, fatigue conditions and restoration defects must be considered.

Highlights

  • In spite of the increase in the use of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPDs), metal-ceramic systems continue to be used due to their clinical longevity and biocompatibility[17]

  • The purpose of this study was to investigate the stress distribution in all-ceramic and metal-ceramic FPDs designed with different geometries and submitted to different loading conditions by using the finite element analysis

  • Afterwards, dental preparations were done on each tooth using the AutoCad program (2004 version; Autodesk Inc., Neuchatel, Switzerland) as specified by Shillinburg, et al.[23] (1988).All the specific parts, infrastructures, veneering porcelain, cement and the pontic element, were designed with specific dimensions to generate different Fixed Partial Denture (FPD) models, as described below: a) Metal-ceramic FPD with veneering porcelain on both occlusal and cervical surface in the pontic area (Metal-ceramic FPD, Figure 1-A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In spite of the increase in the use of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPDs), metal-ceramic systems continue to be used due to their clinical longevity and biocompatibility[17]. This kind of prosthesis is used mainly when a large number of teeth should be replaced. Manufacturers routinely advertise all-ceramic systems as a viable option for anterior and posterior FPDs, there are few clinical studies to support these claims. The decrease in FPD survival rate after 10 years may be a result of material fatigue[1,27,28,30] and/or a combination of biologic and biomechanical factors[19,25]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call