Abstract
The first part of this paper contains a brief description of the beginnings of modern cosmology, which, the author will argue, was most likely born in the year 1912. Some of the pieces of evidence presented here have emerged from recent research in the history of science and are not usually shared with the general audiences in popular science books. In particular, the issue of the correct formulation of the original Big Bang concept, according to the precise words of Fred Hoyle, is discussed. Too often, this point is very deficiently explained (when not just misleadingly) in most of the available generalist literature. Other frequent uses of the same words, Big Bang, as to name the initial singularity of the cosmos, and also whole cosmological models, are then addressed, as evolutions of its original meaning. Quantum and inflationary additions to the celebrated singularity theorems by Penrose, Geroch, Hawking and others led to subsequent results by Borde, Guth and Vilenkin. Additionally, corresponding corrections to the Einstein field equations have originated, in particular, R 2 , f ( R ) , and scalar-tensor gravities, giving rise to a plethora of new singularities. For completeness, an updated table with a classification of the same is given.
Highlights
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, ICE/CSIC and IEEC, Campus UAB, International Laboratory for Theoretical Cosmology, TUSUR University, Tomsk 634050, Russia
This section is devoted to a short remembrance of the origins of modern cosmology
With distances and speeds, the two necessary tools were ready for the greatest revolution in the study of the cosmos to occur: a radical conceptual change that marked the beginning of modern cosmology
Summary
‘Big Bang’ is one among the very few scientific terms that has transcended its original domain of use and meaning, to become a common expression employed by literally everybody nowadays. True specialists will not be lost, since they can distinguish the different contexts; but we cannot be satisfied with that, since the Big Bang issue has transcended the scientists’ domains, and the confusion will persists if we leave things as they are To summarize, this concept is in need of much clarification, and one should try to be more precise and clearly distinguish among these several versions and their exact meanings, in each situation, as we will discuss. The author is quite convinced that these issues, well-known to the true specialists, are in need of a serious discussion and clarification, which, can hardly be done in the reduced space of this article He will try, at least, to sketch and start walking along a possible way to be followed in further depth, in future analysis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.