Abstract

The accurate measurement of the linear accelerator (linac) radiation isocenter is critical, especially for stereotactic treatment. Traditional quality assurance (QA) procedure focuses on the measurement of single radiation isocenter, usually of 6 megavoltage (MV) photon beams. Single radiation isocenter is also commonly assumed in treatment planning systems (TPS). Due to different flattening filters and bending magnet and steering parameters, the radiation isocenter of one energy mode can deviate from another if no special effort was devoted. We present the first experience of the multiradiation isocenters alignment on an Elekta linac, as well as its corresponding QA procedure and clinical impact. An 8 mm ball‐bearing (BB) phantom was placed at the 6 MV radiation isocenter using an Elekta isocenter search algorithm, based on portal images. The 3D radiation isocenter shifts of other photon energy modes relative to the 6 MV were determined. Beam profile scanning for different field sizes was used as an independent method to determine the 2D multiradiation isocenters alignment. To quantify the impact of radiation isocenter offset on targeting accuracy, the 10 MV radiation isocenter was manually offset from that for 6 MV by adjusting the bending magnet current. Because our table isocenter was mechanically aligned to the 6 MV radiation isocenter, the deviation of the table isocentric rotation from the "shifted" 10 MV radiation isocenter after bending magnet adjustment was assessed. Winston‐Lutz test was also performed to confirm the overall radiation isocenter positioning accuracy for all photon energies. The portal image method showed the radiation isocenter of the 10 MV flattening filter‐free mode deviated from others before beam parameter adjustment. After the adjustment, the deviation was greatly improved from 0.96 to 0.35 mm relative to the 6 MV radiation isocenter. The same finding was confirmed by the profile‐scanning method. The maximum deviation of the table isocentric rotation from the 10 MV radiation isocenter was observed to linearly increase with the offset between 6 and 10 MV radiation isocenter; 1 mm radiation isocenter offset can translate to almost 2 mm maximum deviation of the table isocentric rotation from the 10 MV radiation isocenter. The alignment of the multiradiation isocenters is particularly important for high‐precision radiotherapy. Our study provides the medical physics community with a quantitative measure of the multiradiation isocenters alignment. A routine QA method should be considered, to examine the radiation isocenters alignment during the linac acceptance.PACS number: 87.55.Qr, 87.56.bd, 87.56.Fc

Highlights

  • The accurate measurement of a linear accelerator radiation isocenter is critical and will impact the quality of radiation therapy, especially high-precision techniques, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

  • American Association of Physicist in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group (TG) 40(1) provides quality assurance (QA) guidelines for radiation oncology and one important recommendation is that the coincidence of radiation and mechanical isocenter should be within 2 mm diameter

  • For high-precision radiotherapy, such as SRS and SBRT, the multiradiation isocenters alignment is not included in the related AAPM TG reports.[3] the mechanical isocenter and lasers can only be aligned to one radiation isocenter and single radiation isocenter is commonly assumed in treatment planning systems (TPS), so it is critical to align the multiradiation isocenters during acceptance and to establish a routine QA procedure to assure the accurate alignment of the radiation isocenters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The accurate measurement of a linear accelerator (linac) radiation isocenter is critical and will impact the quality of radiation therapy, especially high-precision techniques, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). American Association of Physicist in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group (TG) 40(1) provides quality assurance (QA) guidelines for radiation oncology and one important recommendation is that the coincidence of radiation and mechanical isocenter should be within 2 mm diameter. For high-precision radiotherapy, such as SRS and SBRT, the multiradiation isocenters alignment is not included in the related AAPM TG reports.[3] the mechanical isocenter and lasers can only be aligned to one radiation isocenter and single radiation isocenter is commonly assumed in treatment planning systems (TPS), so it is critical to align the multiradiation isocenters during acceptance and to establish a routine QA procedure to assure the accurate alignment of the radiation isocenters

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call