Abstract
The development of the social sciences needs to rely on precise methods. The nomological model of explanation adopted in the natural sciences is ill-suited for the social sciences. An algorithmic model of society can be a promising solution to existing problems. In its most general form, an algorithm is a generally understood prescription for what actions to perform and in what order to achieve the desired result. Any algorithm can be represented as a set of rules of the form «If A, do D to get P». People are the bearers of this kind of rules that apply in different areas of their activities. The rules are subject to change based on personal and collective experience. There is a special mathematical discipline that studies the laws of evolution of such rules. This discipline is called genetic (evolutionary) programming. Contrary to the threatening name, the algorithmic model does not imply the deprivation of a person’s right to free choice, but it needs this right as a necessary condition for the evolution of social algorithms. These algorithms allow us to give a non-causal, but law-like explanation of many well-known social phenomena, as well as to effectively model the future, which is critically important today. A retrospective look at the evolution of social algorithms shows that the current global crisis of human society is associated with the approach to the point of singularity in their evolution. This is due to the fact that there is no need for direct human participation in the implementation of social algorithms, which is reflected in a fundamental change in the sphere of employment and less need for further development of the sciences.
Highlights
Мысленно зафиксируем на теле человека некоторую точку и рассмотрим ее траекторию от момента пробуждения утром до выхода из дома
A. Shahmaty i mashina T’yuringa: granicy primenimosti vychislitel’nogo podhoda v social’nyh naukah [Chess and the Turing Machine: the limits of applicability of computationalism in the social sciences] // Philosophy of Science and Technology
Summary
Михайлов в статье [1] в заостренной форме обратил внимание на то, что существующие подходы к объяснению социальных явлений не могут сравниться в точности и эффективности с подходами естественных наук, опирающимися на динамические каузальные связи в природе. Мы не собираемся выступать в роли арбитра и судить, кто прав и кто не прав в этой дискуссии, которая, с нашей точки зрения, ушла в сторону и была не о том, что хотел донести И. Доказавшие свою эффективность естественные науки изучают законы природы, имеющие глобальный характер и справедливые как на Земле, так и в далеких мирах. Что люди, составляющие человеческое общество, проявляют себя как активные агенты и склонны к целесообразным действиям, имеющим регулярный массовый характер. URL: https://cyberspace.pgu.ru ве обратиться к алгоритмическим понятиям для объяснения социальных явлений. Наличие агентов действий и повторяемость позволяют классифицировать их как алгоритмические
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Philosophical Problems of Information Technologies and Cyberspace
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.