Abstract

Purpose: currently, for the performance of various job responsibilities by users, there is a wide range of software characterized, in addition to functionality, by cognitive and ergonomic characteristics, on which such user indicators as: work speed, satisfaction, probability of making mistakes, etc. depend. In order to select the most effective software products from a variety of existing analogues, a scientific and methodological tool based on a strict mathematical apparatus is needed, which will avoid subjectivity of the evaluation results. The purpose of the work is to develop a scientific and methodological tool in the form of an algorithm that allows evaluating software products to select the most effective ones. Methods: to achieve this goal, a comparative analysis of a wide range of approaches from such fields of science as visual aesthetics was carried out; human-computer interaction, gestalt psychology, neuroaesthetics, perceptual psychology and ergonomics, which allowed us to identify a number of approaches capable of solving the tasks of this study. Novelty: compared with differential approaches to software evaluation, the developed algorithm is based on the aggregation of a number of selected indicators for evaluating the consistency of information and functional elements of graphical user interfaces. Results: an algorithm for evaluating the consistency of information and functional elements of graphical user interfaces has been developed, which allows evaluating and comparing software products in this area.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call