Abstract
Air injection is a very well-known resource to reduce pressure pulsation magnitude in turbines, especially on Francis type. In the case of large Kaplan designs, even when not so usual, it could be a solution to mitigate vibrations arising when tip vortex cavitation phenomenon becomes erosive and induces structural vibrations. In order to study this alternative, aeration tests were performed on a Kaplan turbine at model and prototype scales. The research was focused on efficiency of different air flow rates injected in reducing vibrations, especially at the draft tube and the discharge ring and also in the efficiency drop magnitude. It was found that results on both scales presents the same trend in particular for vibration levels at the discharge ring. The efficiency drop was overestimated on model tests while on prototype were less than 0.2 % for all power output. On prototype, air has a beneficial effect in reducing pressure fluctuations up to 0.2 ‰ of air flow rate. On model high speed image computing helped to quantify the volume of tip vortex cavitation that is strongly correlated with the vibration level. The hydrophone measurements did not capture the cavitation intensity when air is injected, however on prototype, it was detected by a sonometer installed at the draft tube access gallery.
Highlights
Large-diameter Kaplan turbines may undergo vibration and erosion at the discharge ring due to the development of tip vortex cavitation phenomena
Prototype and model tests results were compared in terms of the standard deviation of the acceleration registered at the discharge ring accelerometer (AC2), as a function of the air flow rate
Sd/sdmax decreases as air flow rate increases the prototype curve shows a steeper slope. It was inferred from model tests at air flow rates greater than 1.0 ‰ do not entail any significant advantage in the mitigation of vibration
Summary
Large-diameter Kaplan turbines may undergo vibration and erosion at the discharge ring due to the development of tip vortex cavitation phenomena. Severe erosion problems can compromise the lifetime of the machine or cause expensive repair stops. As such issues are difficult to foresee at the design stage, even with the help of CFD simulations and model tests, mitigation strategies have become an important subject. Air injection has shown potential in preventing erosion due to cavitation in such cases as the chute of spillways of hydroelectric dams [3]. Arndt et al [5] examined the effect of air injection on NACA profiles for the mitigation of cloud cavitation, and found that it was an effective method of minimizing the erosion potential. Rivetti et al [7, 8] performed
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have