Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigates the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to predict sentencing outcomes in terrorism-related attempted murder cases. By comparing AI model predictions with actual sentences from Israeli civilian and military courts, the research evaluates AI’s accuracy and consistency. Findings indicate that AI predictions align closely with human judgments yet also reveal significant challenges in capturing case-specific nuances. This study contributes to the debate on AI’s role in the legal system, providing insights into developing responsible and effective AI integration in judicial decision-making.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
