Abstract

This study evaluated the behavior of a new generation of bulk-fill resin composites after prolonged exposure to an aqueous environment and accelerated aging in ethanol. Six bulk-fill materials were tested (Tetric PowerFill, Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Fill-Up!, Tetric PowerFlow, SDR Plus Bulk Fill Flowable) and compared to two conventional reference materials (Tetric EvoCeram and Tetric EvoFlow). Flexural strength, modulus, and Weibull parameters were examined at three time points: 1 day, 30 days, and 30 days followed by ethanol immersion. Degree of conversion after 30 days, water sorption, and solubility up to 90 days were also investigated. Filtek One Bulk Fill had the highest flexural strength and modulus among the tested materials, followed by Tetric PowerFill and SDR plus. Flexural strength and modulus of high-viscosity bulk-fill materials showed higher stability after accelerated aging in ethanol compared to their low-viscosity counterparts and reference materials. After 30 days, the degree of conversion was above 80% for all tested materials. Dual-cure material Fill-Up! was the best-cured material. The water sorption was highest for Fill-Up!, Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, and Tetric EvoFlow, while solubility was highest for Tetric EvoCeram. After aging in water and ethanol, new generation high-viscosity bulk-fill materials showed better mechanical properties than low-viscosity bulk-fill and conventional composites under extended light curing conditions.

Highlights

  • Proper placement of conventional composite fillings is often challenging and timeconsuming

  • Three-point bending test according to ISO 4049; Degree of conversion (30 days after light curing); Water sorption and solubility

  • Except for conventional reference materials (TEC and TFLW) and SDR, most materials did not show a decrease in flexural strength values after an extended period in water or water and ethanol

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Proper placement of conventional composite fillings is often challenging and timeconsuming. With the need to simplify the composite filling placement, bulk-fill composite materials were designed. Their advantage is the possibility of application in 4 to 5 mm layers, which allows for a shorter and simpler clinical procedure [3,4,5]. Some manufacturers have reduced the amount of glass fillers to allow deeper light penetration. Others have introduced large filler particles with a reduced surface area that minimize light reflection and scattering [7,8]. Several materials achieve high light penetration owing to the well-matched refractive indices of the filler and the organic matrix, which changes during polymerization and acquires more opacity, desirable for the aesthetic appearance of the filling [9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call