Abstract

We present a systematic comparison of different aggregation schemes for AMG-based solvers in computational fluid dynamics. Our focus lies on the method of the Krylov-accelerated cycle which has very favourable properties for the applications on 3D unstructured meshed. While on conventional CPUs the k-cycle AMG in its known form with double-pairwise aggregation is shown to be approximately as fast as plain aggregation schemes (and therefore recommendable), the algorithm with plain aggregation becomes significantly more efficient on GPUs since the setup of this aggregation scheme is much leaner. Furthermore, we show that the solution phase of k-cycle AMG has excellent scaling properties on modern cluster hardware with up to 256 cores. However, common coarse-grid treatment techniques such as parallel direct solvers or agglomeration schemes form a bottleneck such that the scaling of the setup phase is considerably worse. Block-iterative methods improve the performance here.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.