Abstract

Mutation screens in model organisms have helped identify the foundation of many fundamental organismal phenotypes. An emerging question in evolutionary and behavioral biology is the extent to which these “developmental” genes contribute to the subtle individual variation that characterizes natural populations. A related question is whether individual differences arise from static differences in gene expression that arose during previous life stages, or whether they are due to dynamic regulation of expression during the life stage under investigation. Here, we address these questions using genes that have been discovered to control the development of normal courtship behavior in male Drosophila melanogaster. We examined whether these genes have static or dynamic expression in the heads of adult male flies of different ages and with different levels of social experience. We found that 16 genes of the 25 genes examined were statically expressed, and 9 genes were dynamically expressed with changes related to adult age. No genes exhibited rapid dynamic expression changes due to social experience or age*experience interaction. We therefore conclude that a majority of fly “courtship” genes are statically expressed, while a minority are regulated in adults with respect to age, but not with respect to relevant social experience. These results are consistent with those from a recent microarray analysis that found none of the canonical courtship genes changed expression in male flies after brief exposure to females.

Highlights

  • Mutation screens in model organisms have uncovered the building blocks of many fundamental phenotypes [reviewed in 1,2,3]

  • Plotting the linear discriminant scores for individual samples in each age/experience category revealed that variation in LD1 is mainly explained by differences in gene expression related to age (Figures 1A and 1B)

  • We found that courtship foundation genes are strongly affected by the age of young adult males, but affected weakly if at all by social experience

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mutation screens in model organisms have uncovered the building blocks of many fundamental phenotypes [reviewed in 1,2,3]. These experiments reveal which genes and gene interactions are necessary for the production of a wild-type phenotype. Behavioral variation is known to arise from both statically- and dynamically-expressed genes [e.g., 8,9,10]. Static differences leading to behavioral variation is seen in the foraging gene of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, with two known functional alleles under balancing selection (forR and forS), which correspond to the rover and sitter foraging phenotypes in larvae and adults [11]. An age-dependent increase in the expression of this gene occurs when worker bees transition from young hive-bound nurses to older foragers [8]; artificial stimulation of PKG activity in young bees accelerates the behavioral transition to foraging

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call