Abstract
The United Kingdom was due to leave the European Union on 29 March 2019 and to enter a period of ‘transition’ pending the entry into force of an agreement establishing the future relationship between the EU and the UK. This transition or implementation period was intended to offer continuity and cer-tainty to states, businesses and citizens; a safety net against a cliff-edge disorderly departure and a po-tential bridge to a future relationship. However, as a consequence of the failure to gain domestic par-liamentary approval for the text of the Withdrawal Agreement, things have not gone to plan. Instead of entering a period of transition, the UK remains a Member State of the EU until 31 October 2019. With a new Prime Minister in the UK talking up his willingness to take the UK out of the EU without a deal and without a transition period in place, this article reflects on what the negotiators sought to achieve in agreeing a transition period in the first place and why the politics of Brexit has undermined the purposes of transition.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call