Abstract

In Afghanistan university context, English Departments focusing on preparing or educating EFL teachers’ candidates are of two types; the Education Colleges’ English Departments (ECED) and the Literature Colleges’ English Departments (LCED). The purpose of this research is to investigate the extent to which the two EFL teacher preparation institutions in Afghanistan universities educate efficacious EFL teachers so as to teach English at public schools. It also aims at comparing the teaching efficacy level of male and female EFL teachers as the graduates of the two different English Departments (ECED and LCED) with different curricula in order to find out how these Departments educate public school EFL teachers. The study applied a survey questionnaire to obtain the data from 105 graduates of two English Departments as novice EFL teachers recruited by 45 public schools in a province in Afghanistan. The findings showed that both Departments educate highly efficacious EFL teachers. However, the level of efficacy between the two Departments is significantly different. The study also has some implications to schools of EFL teachers to comprehend their level of professional efficacy and certain implications to English Departments, Universities, and Afghanistan Ministry of Higher Education to understand how different English Departments’ graduates meet the public schools’ EFL requirements.

Highlights

  • Given their shortcomings, teacher preparation institutions prepare and certify teachers with higher teaching efficacy than teachers not having been involved in teacher preparation institutions (Greenberg, 1983; Haberman, 1984; Olsen, 1985 Ashton & Crocker, 1986)

  • This study aims to measure selfefficacy of graduates of English Departments as teacher education institutions, who are already working as EFL novice teachers in Afghanistan public schools

  • Except one participant, other participants (44.8%) showed to have a mediate level of selfefficacy with regard to teaching English as foreign language. It implies that both English Departments as teacher preparation institutions in the same University educate efficacious EFL teachers so that they are enough efficacious to teach English at public schools

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Teacher preparation institutions prepare and certify teachers with higher teaching efficacy than teachers not having been involved in teacher preparation institutions (Greenberg, 1983; Haberman, 1984; Olsen, 1985 Ashton & Crocker, 1986). Research shows that a direct association between teacher preparation institutions and judgements of teacher selfefficacy; only few research has investigated the improvement of teacher self-efficacy established while the teachers’ enrolment in teacher preparation institutions (Hoy & Woolfolk, 1990; Wenner, 2001; Pendergast, 2011). According to Moran (1998), there is some evidence that preparation programs have variety of effects on teachers’ personal as well as general efficacy. As Hoy & Woolfolk (1990) and Spector (1990) assert, general teaching efficacy improves during college programs and drops while teaching, and this suggests that the enthusiasm of younger teachers might be rather lost while they face with the realities and complications of the teaching job. Teacher preparation institutions must take the responsibility of improving teaching efficacy in their graduates so as to meet the learners’ needs (Garica, Arias, Murri, & Serna, 2011; Monica, 2016). Heibert and Morris (2012) and Core (2014) furtherassert that the focus of teacher preparation institutions must be on quality teaching practices and teaching practices must be shared with teacher candidates by professional teachers to produce efficacious graduates

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call