Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between three teacher-related variables, namely, teaching efficacy, institutional identity and motivational strategy use, with students’ L2 achievement. The study further intended to pinpoint gender differences in each of the aforementioned teacher-related variables. To this end, 120 (60 male and 60 female) EFL teachers took part in the study by completing Teacher Efficacy Scale (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001), Institutional Identity Scale developed by Azimi (2012), and Motivational Strategy Use Scale developed by Cheng and Dornyei (2007). Furthermore, the final class outcomes of the teachers’ students (n=2045) were collected. The participants were EFL learners and their teachers. The results of Pearson Correlations indicated that there existed significant and positive relationship between the three aforementioned teacher-related variables of EFL teachers and their students’ L2 achievement. The results revealed that EFL teachers’ efficacy, institutional identity and motivational strategy use had a significant and positive relationship with their students’ L2 achievement. A Significant difference was found between the male and female EFL teachers. Also, Motivational strategy use was the strongest predictor of Iranian EFL students’ L2 achievement. Based on the findings of the study, a number of pedagogical implications could be recommended. The findings will provide rational support for proposing that EFL teachers should invest in improving their knowledge of teaching efficacy, institutional identity and motivational strategy use.

Highlights

  • Teachers are believed to have a fundamental role in students’ achievement (Lasley, Siedentop & Yinger, 2006), and their characteristics can influence learners’ performance (Rockoff, 2004)

  • 120 (60 male and 60 female) English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers took part in the study by completing Teacher Efficacy Scale (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001), Institutional Identity Scale developed by Azimi (2012), and Motivational Strategy Use Scale developed by Cheng and Dornyei (2007)

  • As it is shown here, motivational strategy use with the highest mean is at the first place and teaching efficacy with mean 78.066 is the lowest variable

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Teachers are believed to have a fundamental role in students’ achievement (Lasley, Siedentop & Yinger, 2006), and their characteristics can influence learners’ performance (Rockoff, 2004). New educational trends have been giving increasing consideration to the dynamic, effective, and facilitating role of teachers (Nosratinia & Zaker, 2014). Though various elements can affect the effectiveness of teachers’ performance, their teaching efficacy is regarded as a major feature which can positively affect instructional performances (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001). Teacher efficacy can be defined as “the teacher’s belief in his or her capabilities to organize and execute courses of action required to successfully accomplishing a specific teaching task in a particular context” (Tschannen-Moran, Hoy & Hoy, 1998, p.22)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call