Abstract
Aerated stabilization basins (ASBs) currently account for about one third of the pulp and paper industry's secondary treatment capacity. We surveyed mills with ASBs to analyze design and operating practices. Of the 19 mills that responded, 15 were kraft, reflecting the industry's overall use of ASBs. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) loading to the ASBs varied considerably and were factors in biotreatment performance. Problems identified with some ASBs included excessive solids accumulation resulting in the need for frequent dredging, high TSS discharge, and difficulty with nutrient management. Most ASBs have either two or three cells. An important parameter identified for these cells is the benthal settling area. Too small an area results in a higher dredging frequency, with limited nutrient feedback. In general, ASB systems that used the most intensive mixing and aeration in the upstream cells tended to have a smaller benthal settling area, resulting in the need to dredge more frequently. Ideally, some benthal settling should be designed into the upstream cells to allow nutrient feedback where it is needed most. Key words: aeration tanks, lagoons, basins, aeration, benthic deposits, design, operations, biological treatment, primary treatment, tertiary treatment, nutrients, aerated stabilization basin (ASB).
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call