Abstract

Resource management is crucial for ensuring quality education and research in higher education institutions. The higher education system in Kazakhstan has undergone various reforms to improve resource allocation and utilization. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of the current resource management system in Kazakhstan's higher education. The centralized governance model concentrates decision-making powers regarding resource allocation with the Ministry of Education and Science. This allows aligned strategic development and coordinated quality assurance across all higher education institutions. However, centralized control limits institutional autonomy and flexibility in resource utilization. The norms-based financing methodology promotes equitable distribution of resources based on objective workload indicators. But it overlooks qualitative outcomes and contextual requirements of individual institutions. The focus on per capita financing norms overlooks the need for optimal allocation across different expenditure heads. The analysis suggests that the resource management system has ensured stability and quality control in Kazakhstan's higher education system. However, there is a need for calibrated reforms to allow greater institutional autonomy along with accountability; balanced financing across different inputs; and linking resource allocation with qualitative outcomes. The recommendations include development of institutional leadership capabilities, clustered/differentiated approach to financing, linking funding with outcomes, and adoption of total quality management principles in resource governance.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call