Abstract

Each year, congenital defects, trauma or cancer often results in considerable physical disfigurement for many people worldwide. This adversely impacts their psychological, social and economic outlook, leading to poor life experiences and negative health outcomes. In many cases of soft tissue disfigurement, highly personalized prostheses are available to restore both aesthetics and function. As discussed in part A of this review, key to the success of any soft tissue prosthetic is the fundamental properties of the materials. This determines the maximum attainable level of aesthetics, attachment mechanisms, fabrication complexity, cost, and robustness. Since the early-mid 20th century, polymers have completely replaced natural materials in prosthetics, with advances in both material properties and fabrication techniques leading to significantly improved capabilities. In part A, we discussed the history of polymers in prosthetics, their ideal properties, and the application of polymers in prostheses for the ear, nose, eye, breast and finger. We also reviewed the latest developments in advanced manufacturing and 3D printing, including different fabrication technologies and new and upcoming materials. In this review, Part B, we detail the chemistry of the most commonly used synthetic polymers in soft tissue prosthetics; silicone, acrylic resin, vinyl polymer, and polyurethane elastomer. For each polymer, we briefly discuss their history before detailing their chemistry and fabrication processes. We also discuss degradation of the polymer in the context of their application in prosthetics, including time and weathering, the impact of skin secretions, microbial growth and cleaning and disinfecting. Although advanced manufacturing promises new fabrication capabilities using exotic synthetic polymers with programmable material properties, silicones and acrylics remain the most commonly used materials in prosthetics today. As research in this field progresses, development of new variations and fabrication techniques based on these synthetic polymers will lead to even better and more robust soft tissue prosthetics, with improved life-like aesthetics and lower cost manufacturing.

Highlights

  • Congenital defects, trauma, or cancer often causes loss or disfigurement of tissue leading to distress and impairment for millions worldwide, significantly affecting their social, economic and psychological health (Tagkalakis and Demiri, 2009)

  • Polymers in soft tissue prosthetics are life-changing for most people affected by disfigurement by restoring function and aesthetics

  • The key challenge is to replicate all unique properties of natural living tissue using these synthetic polymer materials

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Congenital defects, trauma, or cancer often causes loss or disfigurement of tissue leading to distress and impairment for millions worldwide, significantly affecting their social, economic and psychological health (Tagkalakis and Demiri, 2009). The advantages of polymers extend to their ability to more realistically mimic native tissue both esthetically and functionally, as well as providing excellent safety, effectiveness, robustness and accessibility Their application in prosthetics has been extensively studied and the discovery of new prostheses and processing methods has led to radical shifts in many areas of prosthetic design. In modern soft-tissue prosthetics polymers are widely used to restore aesthetics for conditions involving the ear (Ross et al, 2018), face (Fantini et al, 2013), eye (Alam et al, 2017), breast (Cancer Australia, 2019) and hand (Kaira and Dabral, 2014) These prosthetics are often hand-crafted by skilled prosthetists and tailored to the individual anatomy of each patient.

C N R1 N C O R2 O
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call